How to Diagnose Sales Compensation Plan Friction: SPIFFs, Dead Zones, and Behavioural Risk
Learn how to identify sales compensation plan friction, including SPIFF overuse, payout dead zones, and unintended seller behaviours before they damage performance, trust, or cost control.
By Compswell —
Is the compensation plan broken, or is the quota broken? This is one of the most important diagnostic questions in sales compensation, and it is often missed. A plan is broken when the mechanics of the incentive design encourage behaviour the company did not intend. Sellers may delay deals, chase the wrong products, overuse discounts, focus on short term incentives, or optimise for payout in ways that do not support the business. A quota is broken when the target is disconnected from the realistic opportunity available in the territory. In that case, sellers may not be underperforming. They may simply be working against a number that does not reflect their market, account base, or sales capacity. These two problems require different responses. A quota problem should be addressed through quota setting, territory design, or account coverage review. A plan friction problem should be addressed through incentive design, payout mechanics, governance, and behavioural analysis. This article focuses on plan friction: the hidden points in a sales compensation plan where the design starts to create the wrong behaviour. The three common sources are: SPIFFs that distort the core plan Dead zones where extra effort does not meaningfully change payout Unintended behavioural outcomes where the plan rewards the wrong activity The goal is not to criticise the plan. The goal is to understand what the plan is really teaching sellers to do. What is sales compensation plan friction? Sales compensation plan friction is any part of the plan that creates behaviour the company did not intend, cost it did not expect, or confusion that weakens trust in the programme. Friction is not always dramatic. It does not always appear as a payout crisis or a formal dispute. Most of the time, it appears quietly. Sellers learn which deals to prioritise. They learn when to wait. They learn which products are worth their time. They learn which measures matter and which ones can be ignored. Over time, informal behaviours become patterns. The company may still see sales activity, but not always the activity it wanted to pay for. You do not find plan friction only in the total sales number. You find it in the patterns: where deals cluster, where sellers stop pushing, which products are avoided, and which behaviours keep repeating. That is why a friction audit matters. It helps leaders see whether the plan is supporting the business strategy or quietly pulling sellers in another direction. The three main sources of plan friction Most plan friction comes from three places. | Friction source | What it means | What to look for | | | | | | SPIFF distortion | Short term incentives start to compete with the core plan | Deal timing shifts, sellers wait for extra incentives, SPIFF spend grows | | Dead zones | Sellers enter attainment ranges where extra effort has little payout impact | Clusters just above threshold or just below quota | | Behavioural misalignment | The plan rewards activity that does not support business outcomes | Discounting, wrong product mix, low quality deals, poor customer outcomes | Each one tells you something different about the plan. SPIFF distortion tells you the core plan may not be strong enough or clear enough. Dead zones tell you the payout curve may not create enough pull at critical points. Behavioural misalignment tells you the plan may be measuring the wrong thing or rewarding one outcome while the business needs another. SPIFF distortion: when short term incentives compete with the core plan A SPIFF, or Sales Performance Incentive Fund, is a short term incentive used to drive a specific action. It might be used to promote a product, support a campaign, accelerate pipeline movement, or focus attention on a strategic priority. SPIFFs can be useful. They become a problem when they are used too often, designed too loosely, or allowed to compete with the core compensation plan. The core plan should carry the main performance message. A SPIFF should support that message for a specific reason and for a limited period. When sellers become more focused on the next SPIFF than on the main plan, the incentive structure has started to drift. Signs that SPIFFs are creating friction SPIFF friction often appears in four ways. The core plan stops driving behaviour. If sellers pay more attention to temporary incentives than to their quota, the SPIFF has become too powerful. This usually means the core plan is not doing enough work, or the SPIFF is rewarding something that should have been built into the main design. Sellers wait for the next incentive. If deals slow down before a SPIFF and then close during the SPIFF period, the company may be paying extra for behaviour that would have happened anyway. In that case, the SPIFF is not creating demand. It is changing timing. SPIFF income becomes predictable. A SPIFF should be tactical. If sellers begin to treat SPIFF income as a regular part of expected earnings, it has become part of compensation without the same level of governance as the core plan. SPIFF spend is not included in cost modelling. If Finance sees only the core commission cost and not the total SPIFF spend, the true compensation cost of sales is understated. This creates budget risk and weakens confidence in the programme. How to diagnose SPIFF friction A practical SPIFF review should answer these questions: Which SPIFFs have run in the past 12 months? What behaviour was each SPIFF intended to drive? What did the company pay? Did the behaviour continue after the SPIFF ended? Did deal timing change before, during, or after the SPIFF? Did the SPIFF pull attention away from higher value products or priorities? Is total SPIFF spend visible to Finance? One useful test is to compare product mix and deal velocity during SPIFF periods against non SPIFF periods. If performance rises sharply during the SPIFF and drops immediately after, the SPIFF may be shifting timing rather than creating real demand. If SPIFF spend consistently becomes a meaningful share of total variable pay, it may be time to ask whether the core plan needs redesign rather than more short term incentives. Dead zones: when extra effort does not change payout enough A dead zone is a part of the attainment range where extra performance has little or no meaningful impact on payout. This matters because sellers respond to the payout curve. If the plan does not reward movement through a certain range, sellers may slow down or redirect their effort. Dead zones usually appear in two places. Below threshold. A threshold is intended to prevent payout for very low performance. That can be reasonable. But if the threshold is too high, a seller who is far below it may decide that the gap is too large to close. The plan accidentally creates a surrender point. Between threshold and target. Some plans pay at the same rate across a wide range of attainment. The seller earns something, but the marginal reward for pushing from 82 percent to 92 percent may not feel meaningful. If many sellers sit in this range, the plan may not create enough pull toward target. Signs of dead zone problems Dead zones show up in attainment patterns. You may see a large cluster just above threshold. For example, many sellers finish around 81 percent when the threshold is 80 percent. You may see a large group just below quota. For example, many sellers finish between 90 percent and 97 percent, but fewer sellers push through to 100 percent. You may also see low movement across the middle of the curve. Sellers are earning something, but the plan does not create enough financial reason to stretch. These patterns do not prove bad behaviour. They show where the plan may not be creating the right energy. How to diagnose dead zones Start by plotting attainment distribution. Use practical bands such as: Below 50 percent 50 percent to 70 percent 70 percent to 80 percent 80 percent to 90 percent 90 percent to 100 percent 100 percent to 110 percent 110 percent
All Compswell Insights articles